Worked example · Tier 2 · Sixth grade

Tier 2: A resource student with dyslexia instruction — Casey Huang

The student

Casey is a sixth grader identified with a specific learning disability in reading. She receives dyslexia intervention in the resource room, delivered through an evidence-based reading program five days a week, 45 minutes per session, and her IEP requires that the program be delivered by a documented dyslexia practitioner. Her IEP carries two reading goals, one for decoding multisyllabic words and one for reading fluency at grade level. It documents no other goals or services: no math or writing instruction, no behavior or communication supports, no related services, and no paraprofessional.

Rating the domains

Curriculum & Instruction is the only domain with a direct service, so it's the only one rated. It comes out Significant, on the credential factor:

Curriculum & Instruction — Significant

  • Factor A — Moderate. The dyslexia program is delivered through an evidence-based curriculum for 225 minutes a week against two reading goals.
  • Factor B — Significant. The IEP requires the dyslexia instruction to be delivered with fidelity by a documented practitioner, a specialized qualification the rubric recognizes.
  • Factor C — Moderate. The program requires a small group held within its fidelity requirements.
  • Factor D — Minimum. She uses the program's adapted materials.

The other four domains have no direct service.

The rubric draws a line between a documented dyslexia practitioner and a higher advanced-level practitioner, and the rule is to rate the level the IEP actually requires — not the most intensive version available. Casey's IEP requires the documented practitioner, so that's what's rated.

Service groups

Service groups follow from two separate things: a student's related services, and any dedicated one-to-one staffing. Casey's dyslexia instruction is specialized instruction rather than a related service, and her IEP documents no related services and no dedicated one-to-one aide. She has no service group.

The determination

Casey has no override, so the domain ratings set the tier. A single Significant domain, with the other four carrying no service, places her at Tier 2. How the domain scores produce a tier.

Casey's case turns on the credential factor: her one academic domain reaches Significant not because of how much instruction she receives, but because her IEP requires a documented dyslexia practitioner to deliver it. The rubric rates the provider qualification the IEP documents, and here that qualification is what carries the domain.

Intensity of Services determination
Tier2
Related services groupnone
1:1 groupnone

Related examples