Student examples.

What students look like at each funding tier.

The Intensity of Services rubric is abstract — five domains, four factors from None to Significant, two pattern rules and three overrides, and a separate set of service groups. This page shows it applied to specific students: each example takes a composite student, walks the IEP through the rubric, and places them at a tier and a service group — so you can see what a "Tier 3 student" or a "Tier 7 student" actually looks like rather than inferring it from the rules.

The students span kindergarten through high school. Every student here is composite — no real student data appears. Where a rating involves genuine professional judgment, the example says so rather than implying the rubric is more precise than it is.

Tier 1 — the floor

The lowest tier — a student can reach it two different ways, which is why it's the one tier with two examples.

Up the ladder — Tiers 2 to 5

As more domains carry service and reach Significant, a student climbs. These four show the combined domain ratings at work.

The top — Tiers 6, 7, 8

Where the two pattern rules and the residential override set the tier. Read 5→6→7 in order to see the pattern logic click.

How to read the Tier 5 → 6 → 7 contrast

If you read only three of these, read these three in order. They share nearly the same profile and differ only in the fifth domain — the heart of the model: the tier reflects the pattern of a student's needs across all five domains, not a single combined total.

Example Fifth domain Tier How it's set
Grade 10, four involved domainsno service5combined domain ratings
Grade 2, four significant + one moderateModerate6the four-Significant-and-one-Moderate pattern
Grade 7, all five significantSignificant7the five-Significant pattern